Bitcoin: Nonstandard type script’s address [duplicate]

Expressing non -standard outputs of bitcoin transactions with unique addresses

When dealing with non -standard transaction outputs, it may be difficult to identify and decode the appropriate scripting addresses. In this article, we will examine the method of expressing these transaction outputs in human -readable format, namely a focus on unique addresses that may not be clearly identified through standard Blockchain Explorer tools.

Understanding non -standard transaction outputs

The outputs of non -standard transactions are generated using the Bitcoin scripting system using the ECDSA digital signature algorithm (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature) and the script object. The txid field contains an output script ID, while subsequent scripts represent individual operations such as transactions or fees.

For non -standard outputs with a large number of scripts, it may be difficult to identify specific scripts and their corresponding addresses. This is where our approach comes – using unique address formats that are used less commonly.

Express of non -standard transaction outputs

To express non -standard outputs of transactions with unique addresses, we will use the following methods:

* Prefix-script encoding

: Instead of using Txid as a prefix for scripts, we use a unique identifier to represent each script. Create a mapping between the script output ID and the appropriate scripts index.

* Signature Signature Format : Edit the script signature format so that it contains another field that stores a unique address.

Here’s an example of what it might look like:

`

1 – 0x00000000 (TXID)

| 2 – Script_index

| 3 – OP_0x00000001 (op_code) = 0x00000001

| 4 – OP_0x00000002 (op_code) = 0x00000008

| 5 – Amount_0x0000001F (amount)

| 6 – Script_0x00000003 (Skript_0_0x00000003) = address_0x00000003

2 – 0x00000000 (TXID)

| 3 – 0x00000001 (op_code) = op_0x00000001

| 4 – 0x00000002 (op_code) = op_0x00000008

| 5 – Amount_0x0000001F (amount)

| 6 – Script_0x00000003 (Skript_0_0x00000003) = address_0x00000003

2 – 0x00000000 (TXID)

| 3 – 0x00000001 (op_code) = op_0x00000001

| 4 – 0x00000002 (op_code) = op_0x00000008

| 5 – Amount_0x0000001F (amount)

| 6 – Script_0x00000003 (Skript_0_0x00000003) = address_0x00000003

…

`

In this coding, each output script is represented by a unique identifier (txid), followed by the corresponding ‘op_code, sum “and then another field to store a unique address.

Example of using a case

To demonstrate this approach in action, consider the non -standard output of the transaction that contains multiple scripts:

`

1 – 0x00000000 (TXID)

| 2 – Script_index_0

| 3 – OP_0x00000001 (op_code) = 0x00000001

| 4 – Amount_0x0000001F (amount)

| 5 – Script_0x00000003 (Skript_0_0x00000003) = Address_0x00000003

2 – 0x00000000 (TXID)

| 3 – 0x00000001 (op_code) = op_0x00000001

| 4 – Amount_0x0000001F (amount)

| 5 – Script_0x00000004 (Script_0_0x00000004) = address_0x00000005

…

`

In this example, the first output script has op_code 0x00000001, while the second output script hasop_code0x00000008. Corresponding amounts are stored in separate fields in each output script.

Using a unique address format, we can express non -standard transaction outputs in a way that is easy to read and understand, which facilitates the analysis and visualization of data.

Conclusion

The expression of non -standard outputs of bitcoin transactions with unique addresses requires creativity and a little scripting magic. By using prefix-script and modification of the script signature format, we can create a mapping between the output scripts and their corresponding addresses. This approach allows more effective analysis and visualization of data, which makes it easier to identify patterns and trends in the network.